| |
|
Putnam
County Community Open Space Fund
Fact Sheet
(5/4/05)
The proposed Putnam County Community Open Space Fund will create a
$20 million fund for the protection
of vulnerable open space in the
county
- Moneys
from the fund will be used to acquire land in Putnam County that
is important
for our drinking water quality, air quality,
passive recreational opportunities and the natural environment,
as well as farmland and other important open landscapes.
- Protection
recommendations will be made by a committee of individuals appointed
by the legislature, the County Executive and the two
land trusts in the county (the Hudson Highlands Land Trust and the Putnam
County Land Trust).
- The average
residential homeowner will pay only $44.58 per year over the 20-year
life of the fund ($0.16/$1,000
of equalized full
value assessment).
Polling shows
that Putnam County voters strongly support substantial funding for
open space
- 58 percent
would support a $20 million bond measure to create an Open Space
Preservation
Trust Fund to acquire environmentally sensitive
open space threatened by development.
- When provided
with additional information about the ballot measure, including
uses for funds
and arguments both for and against, support
for the Open Space Preservation Trust Fund increased to 67 percent.
- The
survey of 400 registered Putnam County voters was conducted in
June 2004 by Barry Zeplowitz and Associates, a Buffalo-based
firm.
Voters are very
concerned about growth and over-development
- Voters polled
cited growth and development as the most important issue facing
Putnam County,
receiving a greater number of responses than
other typical top tier local issues including taxes, schools
and education, and the economy.
- 74 percent
of survey respondents feel that sprawl and over-development
is a serious problem compared to other issues facing Putnam
County.
- Putnam County
is the fourth fastest growing county in New York State.
- According
to the Census Bureau, the population grew 5 percent between 2000
and 2004, from 95,745 to 100,570, nearly four times
the
state average of 1.3 percent.
The Putnam County
Community Open Space Fund will be put to the voters for approval
this November
On May 3, the
Putnam County Legislature voted unanimously to put
the fund on the ballot this November, for voter approval.
The $20 million
Putnam County Community Open Space Fund ought to go to voters for
approval, as is the practice across the country
- If Putnam County
seeks voter approval for a bond measure, it would follow the
lead of other New York counties. In 2004, voters
in Nassau County overwhelmingly approved a $50 million open bond
measure by 77 percent and voters in Suffolk County overwhelmingly
approved
a $75 million open space bond measure by 68 percent.
- 92 percent
of Putnam County voters surveyed believe that if the county proposes
to establish a $20 million Putnam County Community Open
Space Fund, then the proposal should be referred to the voters to decide.
- Across
the country, county governments routinely seek voter approval
for open space ballot measures, in most cases general obligation
bonds.
- Between 1996
and 2004, 267 county land conservation ballot measures were taken
to the voters and 207 were approved nationwide
(78 percent
passage rate).
Establishing a Putnam County Community Open Space Fund at $20 million
could leverage land protection funding of $40 - $50 million
- With county
funds leveraging matching funds from municipalities, non-profit land
conservation
groups, the state, and the federal government,
a total of $40 - $50 million in land protection activity could be generated.
Establishment and funding of a Putnam County open space program would
likely inspire towns in the county to approve their own open space
ballot measures
- The voters
in Hudson River Valley towns approved sixteen of eighteen municipal
land conservation
ballot measures between 1998
and 2002, a passage rate of 89 percent.
- Putnam County
municipalities also feel the pressure of growth and the
need to address the loss of open space; the incentive of county
matching funds may cause towns to seek passage of their own open space funding
measures.
|
|