. . . Old-growth forest
is more desirable
(Original publication: September 30, 2003) This
logging project will ensure that the state will cash in
on timber sales and the public will be denied experiencing
the splendor of old-growth forest here for another 300 years.
How is it these folks can find a thousand reasons for lumbering
— "overcrowding," "insect infestation,"
"need for open habitat for deer and other edge-feeders"
(as though there were a shortage of deer) — but cannot
find a single reason to allow any significant (read "commercially
viable") tract in their care to attain old-growth status?
Professor Rene Germain said, "We do not have a shortage
of trees," but we do have an absence of the type of
hardwood forest that wowed the pioneers and sustained hundreds
of species dependent on that multi-aged mix of massive mature
trees, standing snags, fallen decaying trees, open swathes
carved by windfalls and fires, and thick stands of young
trees competing to replace the old that only develops with
time, lots of time — about 300 years, at least. The
varied tree sizes and ages provided the antithesis of the
bleak, dark, forage-less desert that pro-lumbering types
invariably describe to those who never saw the real thing.
It is no tree farm that draws millions of tourists to gaze
awestruck at the giants of Smokey Mountain National Park;
nor is it an "overgrown" tangle choked with briars,
or a dark morass in need of the kind of "regeneration"
our local experts would provide. Nature created that beauty
all by herself, and would that we give her the chance to
amaze future generations in Putnam County.
Henry Hild, Bronxville
|